Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Names a post office building in Oak Park, Illinois after Detective Allan Reddins.
The problem
The post office facility at 901 Lake Street lacks an official designation honoring Detective Allan Reddins.
The proposal
The bill officially designates the U.S. Postal Service facility at 901 Lake Street in Oak Park, Illinois as the Detective Allan Reddins Post Office Building.
The impact
Oak Park residents and postal customers will see the building renamed. The honor recognizes Detective Reddins' service and contributions to the community.
The designation recognizes and honors Detective Allan Reddins' service to the Oak Park community. Public buildings named after respected local figures celebrate their contributions and preserve community memory.
Naming a public facility after a local hero can strengthen community identity and pride. It serves as a visible reminder of the service members who have contributed to the area.
Designating an existing building requires minimal government resources or spending. This honors the individual without creating new expenses or programs.
Building designations have no direct impact on postal services or community needs. The name change doesn't address actual community problems or improve services.
Without details about Detective Reddins' specific accomplishments or relevance, voters cannot fully evaluate the appropriateness of this honor. The bill provides no context for the designation.
Congress spending time on building name designations, even uncontroversial ones, uses legislative resources that could address other issues. Individual facility naming might be better handled locally.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.