Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes a tax on oil company profits that exceed certain thresholds.
The problem
Oil companies have earned record profits while gas prices remain high for consumers. Some argue these windfall profits warrant additional taxation.
The proposal
Establishes a tax on oil company profits above a specified level. Revenue would presumably go to the federal government.
The impact
Oil companies would pay more taxes. Consumers might see effects on gas prices. Government revenue would increase.
A windfall profits tax could generate significant tax revenue for the federal government. This money could potentially fund infrastructure, energy programs, or deficit reduction. Supporters argue wealthy corporations should contribute during periods of exceptional profitability.
Proponents argue that taxing excessive oil profits could pressure companies to moderate prices or increase production. Lower gas prices would benefit consumers and reduce inflation pressures across the economy.
Supporters contend that windfall profits represent unexpected gains from market conditions beyond normal business operations. Taxing these profits is fairer than allowing companies to retain all gains while consumers struggle with fuel costs.
Tax revenue could fund renewable energy development and climate initiatives. This could accelerate the shift away from fossil fuels and support clean energy infrastructure.
Oil companies might reduce spending on exploration, production, and infrastructure if profits are taxed heavily. Lower investment could reduce energy supply and potentially raise prices long-term, offsetting intended benefits.
A windfall profits tax on U.S. oil companies could make them less competitive globally compared to foreign competitors. Companies might relocate operations or assets to countries with lower tax burdens.
Companies typically pass tax costs to consumers through higher prices. A windfall profits tax might increase gas prices rather than lower them, worsening inflation and hurting consumers.
Defining 'windfall' profits and appropriate thresholds is technically complex. Poor definitions could harm legitimate business activities or fail to target intended profits, creating unintended economic consequences.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.