Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to strengthen and improve federal anti-bribery laws and enforcement.
The problem
Current anti-bribery laws may have gaps or weaknesses that allow corruption to occur. Federal agencies need clearer tools to prosecute bribery cases effectively.
The proposal
Updates federal anti-bribery statutes to close loopholes, strengthen penalties, and improve enforcement mechanisms for officials and private sector corruption.
The impact
Federal prosecutors, government officials, and businesses would face stricter bribery rules and stronger enforcement actions.
Stronger anti-bribery laws make it harder for officials to accept illegal payments. This protects public trust in government and ensures officials act in the public interest.
Companies compete based on merit, not bribes. Clearer rules level the playing field for honest businesses and prevent corrupt deals.
Prosecutors get updated legal tools to catch and prosecute bribery cases. This makes corruption riskier and deters potential wrongdoing.
When bribery is reduced, government decisions serve citizens instead of corrupt interests. Roads, contracts, and services get allocated fairly.
Businesses may need to spend money on training and compliance programs to follow stricter rules. Small companies might face higher costs than large ones.
If the bill defines bribery too broadly, legitimate business gifts or lobbying could be misinterpreted. Legal uncertainty could harm normal business activities.
New laws require more prosecutors and investigators. This increases government spending and may burden already-full court systems.
Stricter rules might make U.S. companies less competitive globally if other countries don't enforce similar standards.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.