Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires detention facilities to provide sexual abuse prevention and support services for inmates.
The problem
Incarcerated people face high rates of sexual abuse with limited access to prevention, reporting, and victim support services in detention facilities.
The proposal
Mandates detention facilities establish sexual abuse prevention programs, reporting mechanisms, and victim support services including counseling and medical care.
The impact
Detained individuals gain access to abuse prevention and support; facilities must implement new programs and policies; staff require training on prevention and response.
Incarcerated people have limited ability to protect themselves. Creating mandatory services addresses a serious safety gap in detention facilities.
Provides medical care, counseling, and mental health services to abuse victims. Improves rehabilitation outcomes and reduces trauma-related complications.
Clear prevention protocols and documented services may reduce legal claims against detention facilities and create accountability standards.
Mandatory training and reporting procedures create systemic change in how facilities address abuse, benefiting all detainees and staff.
Implementing new programs, training staff, and providing services requires substantial funding. Smaller facilities may struggle with financial burden.
Facilities must develop new protocols, track compliance, and maintain documentation. Requires staff training and administrative resources.
Without official summary, specific requirements unclear. Facilities may struggle interpreting obligations and compliance expectations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.