Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to eliminate birth tourism by restricting citizenship for children born to non-citizen parents.
The problem
Some foreign nationals travel to the US specifically to give birth, obtaining citizenship for their children. Critics argue this undermines immigration law and citizenship standards.
The proposal
The bill would likely modify birthright citizenship rules or restrict automatic citizenship for children born to non-citizen parents in the United States.
The impact
Would affect pregnant non-citizens, their US-born children, hospitals providing delivery services, and immigration enforcement agencies.
Supporters believe restricting birth tourism helps control who becomes a US citizen and discourages people from exploiting citizenship rules. They argue it strengthens immigration law enforcement.
Proponents claim eliminating birth tourism incentives may reduce unauthorized border crossings. They argue fewer people would travel illegally if birth here doesn't guarantee citizenship.
Some argue reduced birth tourism could lower government costs for childbirth services and benefits for non-citizen families. However, actual savings are difficult to measure.
The 14th Amendment grants citizenship to all persons born in the US. Limiting this would require significant legal changes and faces major constitutional questions about citizens' rights.
Critics worry the policy could discriminate against non-citizen families and create two classes of people born in America. This raises fairness and equality questions.
Hospitals would need to verify parental citizenship status at birth, creating bureaucratic burdens and confusion. Implementation could delay birth certificate processing and increase costs.
Birth tourism appears to be a small percentage of total US births. Critics question whether the policy addresses a real widespread problem or creates costs for minimal benefit.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.