Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes to restore gray wolves to the Northern Great Lakes region through federal recovery efforts.
The problem
Gray wolf populations in the Northern Great Lakes were nearly eliminated. The bill addresses whether federal action should restore this species to historical ranges.
The proposal
Establishes a federal program to recover gray wolves in the Northern Great Lakes ecosystem through management, protection, and coordination with states.
The impact
Affects wildlife managers, ranchers, hunters, environmentalists, and rural communities in the Great Lakes region where wolves would be reintroduced.
Wolves help control deer populations and maintain forest health. Restoring them could improve overall ecosystem balance in the Great Lakes region. This supports long-term environmental stability.
Federal law requires protection of endangered species. This bill follows existing rules about restoring wildlife populations. It provides a legal framework for recovery efforts.
Wolf recovery creates opportunities for research and education about predators and ecosystems. This can increase public understanding of wildlife management.
Wolf watching can attract tourists and create economic opportunities in rural areas. Some regions have seen increased visitor spending from wildlife viewing.
Wolves may kill cattle, sheep, and family animals on farms and ranches. Ranchers could face financial losses and need compensation programs.
Wolves compete with hunters for deer and other game animals. This reduces hunting opportunities and conflicts with local traditions and economies.
Some people worry about wolf attacks on humans, though attacks are rare. Fear and uncertainty about living near wolves can affect quality of life.
Many Northern Great Lakes residents and officials oppose federal wolf reintroduction. This creates conflict between federal mandates and local control of land management.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.