Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
The bill transfers federal land to the Grand Ronde tribe in Oregon.
The problem
The Grand Ronde Indian tribe seeks return of ancestral lands in Oregon that were historically taken from them.
The proposal
The bill authorizes the federal government to transfer specified land to the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde for their use and governance.
The impact
The Grand Ronde tribe gains land control and resources. Local governments and stakeholders affected by land transfer and tribal jurisdiction changes.
Returns land to a Native American tribe, addressing historical injustices. Supports tribal sovereignty and self-determination. Recognizes tribal claims to ancestral territory.
Land transfer enables tribal economic development, resource management, and employment for tribal members. Tribes can develop their land for housing, business, or conservation.
Allows tribe to manage land according to their values and traditions. Enables preservation of cultural sites and natural resources important to tribal identity.
Transfer of land increases tribal authority and self-governance capabilities. Expands tribal resources for providing services to members.
Land transfer may reduce property tax revenue for local counties and cities. Communities lose jurisdiction and control over transferred land. May affect local services and infrastructure planning.
Tribal use of land may differ from surrounding community expectations. Unclear regulations could create disputes between tribe and neighboring property owners.
Land transfer decided by Congress with limited local community participation. Affected residents may feel excluded from decision-making process.
Bill could establish precedent for other land transfer requests from tribes nationwide. May create uncertainty about federal land management and property stability.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.