Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects biological data systems as critical infrastructure from cyber threats.
The problem
Biological research data and systems face increasing cyber attacks that could disrupt medical research, public health responses, and scientific progress.
The proposal
Designates biological data systems as critical infrastructure and establishes federal protections, security standards, and oversight requirements for biological research facilities.
The impact
Research institutions, biotech companies, federal labs, and healthcare organizations must adopt new security measures. Potential costs for compliance and security upgrades.
Safeguarding biological data prevents hackers from stealing research or disrupting medical breakthroughs. This keeps advances in disease treatment and vaccines secure.
Protects disease surveillance systems and pandemic response data from cyberattacks. Ensures health agencies can function during emergencies.
Prevents foreign adversaries from accessing biological research that could be weaponized or used against the country.
Establishes consistent security requirements across research institutions so everyone follows the same protection rules.
Small research facilities and universities may struggle to afford new security systems and compliance costs. Could burden academic research.
Additional security requirements and government oversight could slow data sharing between scientists and delay important research discoveries.
Gives government more authority over private research institutions and biological data. Some view this as government overreach into science.
Without an official summary, it's unclear what specific security measures will be required or how much compliance will cost institutions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.