Latest action: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearings held.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to reinvest in water infrastructure and management projects in Western states.
The problem
Western states face aging water infrastructure, drought challenges, and competing water demands between agriculture, cities, and ecosystems.
The proposal
Allocates federal funding for water projects, infrastructure repairs, and conservation programs in Western watersheds and communities.
The impact
Western farmers, cities, tribes, and environmental groups gain funding access. Costs affect federal budget and taxpayers nationwide.
Funding helps fix old pipes and dams, reducing water loss. Better infrastructure ensures reliable water for farms and cities during droughts.
Water projects create construction and engineering jobs in Western communities. Money spent locally boosts regional economies.
Conservation funding can restore rivers and wetlands. Healthy ecosystems benefit fish, wildlife, and recreation areas.
Farmers get better irrigation systems and water reliability. Improved efficiency helps farms stay productive during dry years.
Bill requires significant federal spending. Taxpayers nationwide fund projects benefiting mainly Western states.
Large agricultural operations might benefit more than small farmers. Environmental goals could conflict with farming and development interests.
Without official summary, it is unclear which projects get funded first. Could lead to wasteful spending on less important projects.
Water issues involve many states and tribes with competing interests. Projects may face delays and disputes over how to use funds.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.