Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to use counseling instead of criminal punishment for school discipline issues.
The problem
Schools may criminalize student behavior through law enforcement that could be addressed with counseling and mental health support.
The proposal
The bill likely promotes school counseling programs and mental health interventions as alternatives to criminal charges for student conduct.
The impact
Students, schools, law enforcement, and counselors are affected. Students may receive support instead of criminal records. Schools gain resources.
Criminal records and jail time prevent students from completing education. Counseling keeps students in classrooms where they can learn and graduate.
Many student behaviors stem from trauma, mental health issues, or family problems. Counseling treats these underlying issues rather than just punishing actions.
Juvenile criminal records harm future employment and housing chances. Counseling-based approaches avoid creating permanent legal records.
Counseling programs cost less than juvenile detention or court proceedings. Redirecting funds to mental health support reduces system expenses.
If serious crimes occur, counseling alone may not protect students. Schools need clear procedures for when law enforcement is truly necessary.
Schools already have counselor shortages. Implementing this bill requires hiring and training many more mental health professionals nationwide.
Without clear requirements, schools might ignore the bill or apply it unevenly. Different schools could interpret rules very differently.
Some families prefer stricter discipline for serious misbehavior. Limiting school discipline choices could frustrate parents and community members.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.