Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill transfers Fort Bragg land to help veterans and their families.
The problem
Veterans and their families may lack access to land or housing. Fort Bragg has unused land that could serve this population better.
The proposal
The bill transfers specified Fort Bragg land to support veterans through housing, services, or community development programs.
The impact
Veterans, military families, and surrounding communities near Fort Bragg experience changes in land use and potential new services.
Land transfer could create housing, healthcare facilities, or support services for veterans and their families. This addresses potential shortages of affordable veteran housing in the region.
Unused or underutilized military land could be repurposed for community benefit. This makes better use of existing government property.
Land transfer may boost economic activity and job creation in the Fort Bragg area. Local communities could benefit from new development.
Streamlining land use may improve efficiency of military operations. Clearer land allocation helps the military focus on core missions.
Fort Bragg may lose land needed for military training, operations, or expansion. This could limit military flexibility and readiness.
Transferring and developing land requires money for infrastructure, buildings, and services. Unclear who pays these costs.
The bill summary is missing, making it hard to know exactly which land transfers, to whom, and for what specific purpose. Vague legislation risks poor outcomes.
Communities near Fort Bragg may face traffic, zoning changes, or loss of military presence. Effects on neighboring areas are unclear.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.