Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and Workforce, and Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Makes health data from the Department of Health and Human Services publicly available.
The problem
Health data held by HHS agencies may be difficult for the public, researchers, and policymakers to access, limiting transparency and evidence-based decision making.
The proposal
Requires HHS to make health data more publicly accessible while following privacy and security rules to protect personal information.
The impact
Researchers, public health officials, and citizens gain easier access to health information. Privacy protections remain in place. Government transparency increases.
Researchers can use public health data to study diseases, treatments, and health trends more easily. This could lead to faster medical discoveries and improvements in healthcare quality.
Citizens and news organizations can access health data to check if government programs are working well. This helps hold agencies accountable to the public.
Local health officials and community groups can use real data to plan public health programs and respond to health problems more quickly and effectively.
Tech companies and startups can use available health data to create new tools and applications that help people manage their health better.
Making more health data public could expose sensitive personal information if privacy protections are weak. Hackers might target health databases, putting patient data at risk.
HHS agencies would need to spend money on technology and staff to release and protect data. These costs could be significant and take resources from other programs.
Without clear rules, it may be unclear what data gets released and how private certain health information should remain. This could create confusion and legal disputes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.