Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill creates new enforcement tools to stop foreign websites from selling stolen intellectual property.
The problem
Foreign websites illegally sell counterfeit goods and stolen creative works. U.S. companies lose money and jobs. Current laws struggle to stop overseas pirates.
The proposal
Gives law enforcement stronger powers to shut down foreign websites selling fake products. Allows courts to order payment processors and internet providers to block these sites.
The impact
Technology companies, creative industries, and law enforcement gain new tools. Foreign website operators face consequences. Internet users may see some sites blocked.
U.S. companies that create movies, music, software, and products lose billions to counterfeits. Stronger enforcement helps protect their work and keeps American jobs safe.
Counterfeit operations often fund organized crime and terrorism. Shutting down these websites disrupts illegal networks and makes communities safer.
Legitimate businesses that follow the rules compete fairly when counterfeits are removed. This helps honest companies and workers keep their livelihoods.
Gives U.S. authorities tools to reach across borders where pirates hide. Other countries often appreciate when America tackles piracy affecting their companies too.
Blocking websites raises questions about censorship and who decides what gets removed. Some worry the government could overreach and block legitimate speech or sites.
Law enforcement needs funding, training, and resources to use these new powers. Taxpayers may foot the bill for government expansion without guaranteed results.
Other countries may see this as U.S. overreach into their internet. Could damage trade relationships or trigger retaliation against American websites.
Sophisticated pirates already use tools to hide their locations. Simply blocking sites may just push criminals to use new methods and names.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.