Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S4861)
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requires housing to be safe from lead paint and lead-contaminated water.
The problem
Lead poisoning harms children's brains and health. Many older homes contain lead paint and pipes that contaminate water supplies.
The proposal
The bill likely sets standards for removing lead from housing, testing water, and ensuring landlords fix lead hazards in rental properties.
The impact
Families with children in older homes benefit from safer housing. Landlords face costs for lead removal. Housing prices may increase.
Lead poisoning damages developing brains and causes lasting learning problems. Removing lead from homes prevents serious health damage in children. This saves families from medical costs and lost opportunities.
Lead-related health problems cost hospitals, schools, and government money. Preventing lead exposure reduces emergency room visits and special education needs. Society saves money on treatment and support services.
Clear rules make landlords accountable for removing hazards. Standards help renters know their homes are safe. Consistent rules apply fairly across all neighborhoods.
Low-income families often live in older buildings with more lead. This bill targets protection for vulnerable communities. It helps ensure poor children get same safety as wealthy children.
Lead removal is expensive, sometimes costing thousands per unit. Small landlords may struggle to afford these repairs. Costs could be passed to renters through higher rent.
High remediation costs could force older buildings to close or convert to expensive housing. People needing cheap rent may have fewer options. Gentrification could increase in affected neighborhoods.
Testing millions of homes and removing lead takes time and coordination. Unclear rules could create confusion. Some properties may be harder to fix than others.
If government requires action but doesn't pay for it, costs fall on landlords and renters. Small communities may lack resources to enforce rules. States may struggle with compliance costs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.