Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requires better coordination of electric grid planning across regions and states.
The problem
Electric grid planning often happens separately by region, causing inefficient transmission lines and missed opportunities for shared infrastructure investments.
The proposal
Establishes integrated planning processes requiring local, regional, and interregional transmission planners to coordinate more closely on infrastructure projects.
The impact
Power companies, grid operators, state regulators, and electricity consumers affected through changes to how transmission infrastructure gets planned and built.
Better coordination could reduce redundant transmission lines and lower construction costs. This might lead to more efficient power delivery across state lines.
Integrated planning could streamline approval processes by eliminating conflicting or overlapping plans. Projects might move from planning to construction more quickly.
More efficient infrastructure and faster development could reduce operating costs for utilities. Some savings might pass to consumers through lower rates.
Better regional coordination helps connect wind and solar farms to population centers more effectively. This supports clean energy transitions across multiple states.
Requiring multiple agencies and companies to coordinate adds bureaucratic layers and meetings. This could slow decisions rather than speed them up.
Utilities must invest in new planning systems, staff, and coordination processes. These costs could increase electricity rates for consumers.
Integrated federal planning might override state preferences or local needs. States could lose control over infrastructure decisions within their borders.
The bill lacks details on how integration works, who has authority, and what happens when regions disagree. Vague rules could cause confusion and legal disputes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.