Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands access to long-acting reversible contraception methods.
The problem
Some Americans face barriers accessing LARC contraception like IUDs and implants due to cost, insurance coverage gaps, or limited provider availability.
The proposal
The bill likely increases funding, expands insurance coverage, or removes regulatory barriers to make LARC contraception more accessible and affordable nationwide.
The impact
Women of reproductive age, low-income individuals, and underserved communities would gain easier access to effective birth control options.
Expanding LARC access helps more people get effective contraception they want. This can reduce unintended pregnancies and give individuals more control over family planning decisions.
LARCs are highly effective and long-lasting, potentially reducing costs from unintended pregnancies and related healthcare expenses. This could save money for individuals and the healthcare system overall.
Better access in underserved communities addresses healthcare disparities. It helps ensure all Americans have equal opportunity to access contraception options.
The bill may fund training programs for healthcare providers to insert and manage LARCs. More trained providers means better access across different regions and communities.
Expanding LARC programs requires federal funding. This adds to government spending and may require tax dollars or budget cuts elsewhere.
Some people and organizations object to contraception on religious grounds. They may oppose using government funding for these programs.
Expanding access across all states and regions requires coordination with doctors, hospitals, and insurance companies. This can be complicated and take time to implement.
Requiring broader LARC coverage could increase insurance premiums or change how insurance companies set rates. This might affect healthcare costs for some people.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.