Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill establishes standards for reliable artificial intelligence research and development.
The problem
Artificial intelligence systems need better reliability and safety standards. Current research lacks consistent guidelines for testing AI trustworthiness and preventing failures.
The proposal
Creates frameworks and standards for AI research reliability. Establishes requirements for testing AI systems before deployment and sets guidelines for responsible development.
The impact
Affects AI researchers, tech companies, government agencies, and future AI users. May require new testing procedures and compliance measures for AI development.
Establishing reliability standards helps ensure AI systems work correctly before being used. This reduces risks of AI failures that could harm people or cause problems.
Clear standards help the public trust AI systems more. People feel safer using technology they know has been properly tested and reviewed.
Researchers and companies benefit from knowing exactly what standards they must meet. This reduces confusion and helps the industry develop responsibly.
Strict standards and testing requirements may take extra time and money. This could slow down AI research and development in the United States.
Companies and researchers must spend money to meet new standards and conduct required testing. Smaller organizations may struggle with these expenses.
Without seeing the full bill text, specific requirements are unknown. Vague standards could be hard to follow or could be interpreted differently.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.