Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a new federal division to investigate and prosecute fraud crimes across the United States.
The problem
Fraud crimes are widespread and complex, often crossing state lines. Current law enforcement resources may be fragmented, making it difficult to investigate sophisticated fraud schemes effectively.
The proposal
Establishes a National Fraud Enforcement Division within federal government to coordinate fraud investigations, prosecutions, and enforcement activities across agencies and state lines.
The impact
Federal law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, fraud victims, and businesses affected by fraud schemes. Increases focus on fraud investigation and may deter fraudulent activity.
A dedicated division can coordinate investigations across state lines and agencies more efficiently. This reduces duplication of effort and ensures complex fraud cases are handled systematically.
Focused enforcement against fraud schemes protects individuals and companies from financial losses. Increased prosecution may deter fraudsters from committing crimes.
A dedicated division can develop specialized knowledge and training in detecting sophisticated fraud schemes. This improves investigation quality and conviction rates.
A centralized division can identify and respond quickly to new fraud trends. This helps protect the public from evolving criminal schemes.
Creating a new division requires budget funding for staff, offices, and operations. This increases federal spending and may require tax dollars or budget reallocation.
Multiple federal agencies already investigate fraud. A new division might duplicate existing efforts rather than improve coordination if authorities and responsibilities overlap.
Centralizing fraud enforcement at federal level could shift power away from state and local prosecutors. Some communities may prefer handling fraud cases locally.
Creating a new agency requires hiring staff, establishing procedures, and coordinating with existing agencies. These logistical challenges could delay effectiveness.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.