Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents the government from taking Social Security benefits to pay debts.
The problem
Social Security recipients sometimes have their benefits reduced or seized by the government to repay debts like unpaid taxes or child support obligations.
The proposal
This bill would stop the government from garnishing or withholding Social Security payments to collect debts owed by recipients.
The impact
Social Security recipients would keep all their benefits. Government agencies would lose a tool to collect debts. Some creditors and programs might receive less payment.
Social Security recipients would keep their full benefits, even if they owe money. This ensures seniors and disabled people have stable income for basic needs like food and housing.
Benefit recipients struggling with debt would not lose their primary income source overnight. This could prevent homelessness and poverty among vulnerable populations.
Removing garnishment rules makes the Social Security system simpler to administer and understand for recipients and staff.
The government and creditors would have fewer ways to collect money owed to them. This could mean unpaid taxes and child support go uncollected, reducing revenue.
People who owe money could avoid payment while receiving government benefits. This may seem unfair to those owed money, like child support recipients or tax agencies.
Without the threat of garnishment, some people might be less motivated to pay debts they owe, leading to more unpaid obligations in the system.
Removing garnishment could make it harder to collect child support payments from non-custodial parents, affecting families needing that income.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.