Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addresses wildfire prevention and electric grid reliability during fire season.
The problem
Wildfires damage power infrastructure and threaten grid stability. Power outages during fires endanger public safety and disrupt essential services.
The proposal
Bill likely proposes measures to prevent wildfires near power lines, improve grid resilience, and coordinate emergency responses between energy and fire management agencies.
The impact
Affects power companies, rural communities vulnerable to wildfires, emergency responders, and utility customers dependent on reliable electricity during fire season.
Reducing wildfire damage to power infrastructure helps keep electricity flowing during emergencies. Reliable power supports hospitals, emergency services, and homes needing air conditioning and water pumps.
Preventing wildfire damage to power lines reduces claims and losses for insurance companies. This could eventually lower insurance premiums for homeowners and businesses in fire-prone areas.
Preventing wildfires protects forests, wildlife habitats, and air quality. Coordinating land management with fire prevention helps preserve ecosystems.
Hardening power infrastructure against fire damage keeps the grid running during disasters. This prevents cascading power outages affecting entire regions.
Improving grid infrastructure and implementing fire prevention measures requires significant investment. These costs may eventually be passed to electricity customers through higher rates.
Without an official summary, it's unclear how the bill would actually work. Vague language could lead to ineffective or poorly coordinated implementation.
Federal involvement in state and local land management could create conflicts. Local authorities might lose flexibility in managing forests and emergency responses.
Aggressive fire prevention measures like vegetation removal could harm forests and wildlife. Some approaches might conflict with conservation goals.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.