Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Adds a tax on income from government favors received by officials and their families.
The problem
Concerns that public officials or their relatives may receive unfair financial benefits from government actions, raising conflict of interest and corruption issues.
The proposal
Creates a surtax on income earned from substantial federal government actions benefiting companies owned or controlled by covered public officials or their family members.
The impact
Would affect public officials, their families, and companies they own. May increase taxes on certain business gains. Could apply to government contracts or favorable regulatory decisions.
Discourages public officials from using their position to benefit their own businesses. Makes it financially unattractive to steer government actions toward family companies. Helps maintain public trust in government.
Generates government income from a new tax source. Revenue could fund public services or reduce other taxes. Creates financial consequences for self-dealing behavior.
Levels the playing field for businesses not connected to government officials. Prevents unfair advantages from government favoritism. Encourages competition based on merit rather than political connections.
Reinforces rules against officials profiting from their positions. Sends clear message that corruption has financial costs. Supports broader anti-corruption efforts.
Unclear what counts as 'substantial favorable action' or which companies qualify. Could be difficult and costly to enforce fairly. May lead to legal disputes over which income gets taxed.
May discourage public service if officials cannot operate their businesses. Could push officials to sell companies, causing economic disruption. Might be challenged as unconstitutional taking of property.
Requires IRS to investigate and prove government favors occurred. Demands coordination between tax and ethics officials. Could overwhelm government resources and create delays.
Taxes the income but doesn't prevent the favors from happening. A determined official might accept the tax as cost of doing business. Doesn't fix underlying ethics violations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.