Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires intelligence leaders to report how AI is used in foreign surveillance programs.
The problem
Congress lacks clear information about how artificial intelligence systems are being used in surveillance activities under existing law, raising oversight concerns.
The proposal
The bill directs the Director of National Intelligence to submit a detailed report to Congress about AI use in acquiring, analyzing, and accessing information under Section 702 of FISA.
The impact
Congress gains oversight information; intelligence agencies must document AI practices; potential changes to surveillance methods may follow based on findings.
The report would give Congress detailed information about AI surveillance tools. This helps elected representatives understand and monitor intelligence activities. Better oversight protects citizens from potential abuses.
AI in surveillance is new and fast-changing. A formal report creates an official record of current practices. This helps the public and lawmakers understand what technology does.
The report could reveal potential problems with AI systems before they cause harm. Early detection allows agencies to fix issues or improve safeguards.
Detailed reports about surveillance methods could be leaked or obtained by foreign adversaries. Revealing AI capabilities and limitations might help enemies evade detection.
Creating comprehensive reports takes time and resources. Intelligence agencies may need to slow operations or redirect staff to document AI systems instead of using them.
A report alone cannot force agencies to change practices. Without legal consequences tied to the report, problems may continue even if documented.
Much AI surveillance information is classified. Congress may not be able to share findings with the public, limiting transparency benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.