Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
A bill that would restrict Communist Party activities and affiliations in the United States.
The problem
Concerns about Communist Party organizational activities and influence within U.S. territory and institutions.
The proposal
Establishes legal restrictions on Communist Party membership, organizing, and related activities as a national security measure.
The impact
Affects Communist Party members, political activists, immigrants, and organizations deemed Communist. Influences free speech and association protections.
Supporters argue the bill targets organizations with historical ties to foreign governments and opposing ideologies. They believe restricting such organizations protects national interests. The bill frames regulation as a security measure.
The original Communist Control Act was passed during Cold War era. Proponents argue updating it addresses modern security concerns. They cite examples of state-sponsored activities as justification.
The bill would establish explicit legal definitions and restrictions. Supporters argue this creates clarity for law enforcement and the public. They contend explicit rules prevent confusion about what is prohibited.
Critics argue the bill restricts freedom of speech and political association rights. Supreme Court precedent questions whether membership restrictions alone pass constitutional scrutiny. The bill may violate protected political speech and assembly rights.
Without detailed summary, identifying what exactly constitutes 'Communist' activity is unclear. Overly broad definitions could capture legitimate political speech and activism. This vagueness creates risk of selective enforcement.
Such restrictions may complicate diplomatic relations and trade negotiations with certain nations. Other democracies permit Communist parties to operate legally and compete politically. The bill diverges from typical Western approaches to managing political ideologies.
Monitoring and enforcing membership restrictions is difficult and resource-intensive. Could require expanded surveillance and intelligence operations. Implementation may be impractical and costly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.