Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents past marijuana use from disqualifying people from security clearances and government jobs.
The problem
Current rules can deny security clearances and government positions to people solely based on prior marijuana use, even in states where it is legal.
The proposal
Amends federal law to prevent past marijuana use alone from being grounds to deny security clearances or determine someone unsuitable for government employment.
The impact
Affects federal employees, contractors, military personnel, and job applicants who may have used marijuana previously and seek security clearances or government positions.
More Americans become eligible for federal jobs and security clearances. This includes people from states where marijuana is legal. Removes a barrier that kept qualified people out of government service.
Many states have legalized marijuana. Federal policy currently contradicts state laws by penalizing legal activity. This change brings federal rules more in line with state decisions.
Government agencies struggle to fill positions and grant clearances. Reducing disqualifications expands the pool of eligible candidates and helps fill critical roles faster.
Shifts focus from past use to current behavior and reliability. Someone's current judgment matters more than whether they used marijuana years ago.
Marijuana use could still relate to judgment, reliability, or vulnerability to coercion. The bill doesn't explain how agencies should evaluate these risks without using past use as a factor.
Removing past marijuana use from consideration could reduce the thoroughness of background checks. Agencies might miss patterns of rule-breaking or poor judgment.
Marijuana remains illegal under federal law. This bill essentially deprioritizes federal law enforcement priorities within the security clearance process.
The bill doesn't specify how agencies should handle the change or what alternative criteria to use. This could create confusion and inconsistent decisions across government.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.