Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill would remove fencing around the U.S. Capitol building complex.
The problem
The Capitol has temporary and permanent fencing installed for security after January 6, 2021. This bill addresses concerns about the appearance and accessibility of the Capitol grounds.
The proposal
The bill prohibits fencing at the U.S. Capitol Complex. It would require removal of existing fencing barriers surrounding the Capitol building and grounds.
The impact
Capitol visitors, security personnel, and the general public would be affected. Access to Capitol grounds would change, and security measures would be modified.
Removing fencing would allow citizens greater access to Capitol grounds and make the building more open to visitors. This could restore the Capitol's traditional role as a public space accessible to Americans.
Fencing around the Capitol can symbolize distance from the public. Removing it would signal that Congress is open and accountable to citizens.
Some argue fencing makes the Capitol look like a fortress. Removing barriers could restore the building's historical appearance and national symbolism.
Fencing was installed following the January 6 Capitol attack. Removing it could create security vulnerabilities for members of Congress, staff, and visitors. Capitol Police would face increased challenges protecting the building.
Without barriers, Capitol security operations become more complex and potentially more expensive. Managing access and screening procedures would require additional resources and planning.
The bill removes fencing without requiring study of modern security needs. Congress would be removing protective infrastructure before establishing alternative security measures.
Fencing helps manage large crowds during protests and public gatherings. Without it, controlling crowd movement and ensuring orderly access becomes significantly more difficult.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.