Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents tax increases on survivors of sexual assault and abuse.
The problem
Survivors of sexual assault may face tax consequences on settlements or awards they receive from legal cases or compensation programs.
The proposal
The bill would exclude survivor compensation and settlement awards from taxable income, ensuring survivors do not owe federal taxes on money received.
The impact
Sexual assault and abuse survivors would keep full settlement amounts without tax obligations. Government would lose some tax revenue from these cases.
Survivors could keep full settlement amounts without losing money to taxes. This recognizes that compensation is for harm suffered, not income earned.
Many survivors face medical bills, therapy costs, and lost wages. Tax-free settlements help them recover without additional financial burden.
Removing tax penalties makes survivors more likely to pursue legal action. This can help bring more cases forward and hold offenders accountable.
Other crime victims already receive tax breaks on settlements in some cases. This bill creates consistency in how survivors are treated.
The federal government would collect less tax money from these settlements. This could require spending cuts or other revenue sources elsewhere.
The bill may need clear rules about which awards qualify and which do not. Defining what counts as survivor compensation could be complicated.
If rules are unclear, some people might misuse the tax break for non-qualified payments. Enforcement and auditing could be costly.
Without an official summary, the exact details and scope of the bill are unclear. This makes full analysis of impacts difficult.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.