Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Provides compensation to firefighters injured by PFAS chemicals in firefighting equipment.
The problem
Firefighters are exposed to PFAS chemicals in protective gear and foam used to fight fires. These chemicals may cause serious health injuries. Current law does not compensate them for these damages.
The proposal
The bill creates a compensation program for firefighters who have been injured by PFAS exposure. It likely establishes how injuries are proven and how much money firefighters can receive.
The impact
Firefighters with PFAS-related injuries could receive financial help. The federal government would fund this program. It may affect how fire departments use certain equipment.
Firefighters exposed to harmful chemicals would get money to pay for medical bills and lost wages. This recognizes the sacrifice firefighters make doing dangerous work.
The bill gives injured firefighters a specific way to get compensation rather than fighting in court. This makes the process faster and more fair.
Knowing they must compensate injured workers may push manufacturers to create safer firefighting gear without harmful PFAS chemicals.
The bill acknowledges that PFAS chemicals are dangerous and take responsibility for protecting those exposed on the job.
A new federal compensation program requires government funding, which comes from taxes. The total cost depends on how many firefighters qualify and how much each receives.
Firefighters would need to prove their injury came from PFAS exposure, not other causes. Medical evidence requirements could prevent some from getting help.
Creating compensation for one group of workers exposed to chemicals could lead to demands for similar programs for other workers. This could become very expensive.
The bill compensates injured workers but may not require manufacturers to stop using PFAS chemicals. The harmful exposure could continue.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.