Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates regional energy hubs to coordinate energy production and distribution across multiple states.
The problem
Energy systems operate separately by state, causing inefficiency. Regions need better coordination to meet growing demand and integrate renewable energy sources.
The proposal
Establishes regional energy hubs that allow states to work together on energy planning, production, and delivery. Coordinates infrastructure and resources across state lines.
The impact
Energy companies, utilities, state governments, and consumers may see changes in energy costs, reliability, and how power is distributed regionally.
Regional hubs let states share energy resources efficiently. This can reduce waste and lower costs when one region has extra power to sell to another.
Coordination helps integrate wind and solar power across larger areas. This makes renewable energy more practical and reliable.
Regional coordination strengthens the power grid. It helps prevent blackouts by balancing power across multiple states.
Regional hubs create jobs in energy planning, infrastructure, and management. They attract investment in energy technology and infrastructure.
States may give up some power over their own energy decisions. They must follow regional coordination rules instead of acting independently.
Multiple states working together can be slow and difficult. Disagreements between states could delay decisions and projects.
Creating and running regional hubs requires significant spending. These costs may eventually be passed to consumers through higher energy bills.
The bill lacks details on how hubs will function and make decisions. This uncertainty makes it hard to predict real-world results.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.