Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
A bill to restore and improve environmental health and address pollution and ecosystem damage.
The problem
Environmental degradation, pollution, and ecosystem damage harm public health and natural resources across the United States.
The proposal
The bill would establish programs and funding to restore environmental health, reduce pollution, and protect ecosystems through various federal initiatives.
The impact
States, communities, businesses, and individuals would be affected through new environmental regulations, funding opportunities, and pollution reduction requirements.
Environmental restoration efforts could reduce air and water pollution. This may improve public health outcomes and reduce respiratory and waterborne illnesses. Communities near polluted areas could see measurable improvements in environmental quality.
Restoration projects could create jobs in environmental cleanup, renewable energy, and conservation sectors. Funding for these initiatives might stimulate local economies in affected regions.
Reducing environmental hazards could prevent future health problems and lower healthcare costs. Protection of ecosystems supports natural resources that benefit agriculture and food security.
Restoration efforts preserve biodiversity and natural habitats. Healthy ecosystems provide services like water filtration, carbon storage, and wildlife habitat.
The bill likely requires significant federal funding and resources. Critics argue this increases government spending and may raise taxes or divert funding from other priorities.
New environmental regulations may increase compliance costs for industries and businesses. Small businesses might face particular challenges meeting new pollution reduction standards.
Restoration projects take time and may not show immediate results. Coordination between federal, state, and local agencies could create administrative delays.
Without specific provisions, the bill's actual requirements and impact are unclear. Businesses and communities cannot assess costs or obligations without more information.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.