Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill provides tax incentives to small businesses that keep employees on payroll.
The problem
Small businesses struggle to retain workers. Employee turnover is costly and disruptive. The bill aims to make retention more affordable for small employers.
The proposal
Creates tax credits or deductions for small businesses based on employee retention rates. Likely rewards companies that maintain stable workforces over a specified period.
The impact
Small business owners gain financial incentives. Employees may have more stable jobs. Taxpayers may see reduced revenue if costs exceed projections.
Tax incentives lower the cost of retaining employees. This helps small companies compete with larger employers who can offer higher pay. Stable workforces improve productivity and service quality.
Employees benefit from reduced turnover. Workers have more stable income and can plan their futures better. Long-term employment relationships build stronger workplace communities.
Companies save money when they don't constantly hire and train new people. Retention reduces overall labor costs. Experienced employees are more efficient and skilled.
Small businesses are major job creators. Helping them thrive strengthens local economies. More stable businesses can invest in growth and expansion.
Tax credits and deductions mean less money for the government. This can increase budget deficits unless spending is cut elsewhere. The cost depends on how many businesses qualify.
Larger businesses can navigate tax rules more easily with accountants. Small businesses may struggle to understand or claim benefits. The incentive might not reach the intended audience.
Some businesses retain employees naturally without incentives. Paying them to do what they'd do anyway wastes tax dollars. It's hard to measure what behavior actually changed.
Workers leave jobs for many reasons: low pay, poor conditions, better opportunities. Tax credits alone don't fix these underlying problems. The bill may not actually solve retention if wages remain too low.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.