Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires companies to be more transparent about how they use communications and technology data.
The problem
Tech and communications companies collect large amounts of user data but don't always clearly explain what they do with it or how it affects people.
The proposal
The bill would require companies to disclose their data practices, policies, and how they handle customer information more openly and clearly.
The impact
Tech companies and communications providers must change practices; consumers get more information about their data; regulators gain oversight tools.
People would know more about what data companies collect and how it's used. This helps consumers make informed decisions about which services to use. Better information protects privacy.
Requiring all companies to follow the same transparency rules creates a level playing field. Smaller tech companies can compete more fairly when everyone has the same requirements.
The bill establishes clear rules for what companies must disclose. This gives businesses specific guidance on compliance instead of guessing what regulators expect.
Transparency requirements discourage companies from misusing data. Knowing they must disclose practices makes companies less likely to sell data inappropriately or use it harmfully.
Companies must spend money to create new disclosure systems and update processes. Small tech companies may struggle more with these costs than large ones. Compliance expenses could be passed to consumers.
Detailed transparency requirements could create very long, complicated disclosures that confuse rather than help consumers. People might ignore dense legal documents anyway.
U.S. companies disclosing practices might be disadvantaged against foreign companies with fewer rules. American companies could lose market share internationally.
Companies might argue that detailed disclosures reveal trade secrets or competitive strategies. This could lead to disputes over what must be disclosed versus protected.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.