Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Transfers land from federal government to the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde.
The problem
The Grand Ronde Tribe seeks federal land transfer to expand tribal territory and support tribal sovereignty and economic development objectives.
The proposal
The bill transfers specified federal land parcels to the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde for tribal ownership and management.
The impact
The Grand Ronde Tribe gains land assets and control. Federal government loses land management authority. Local communities and states may experience jurisdictional changes.
Land transfer supports tribal self-governance and self-determination. It allows the tribe to manage resources according to their own laws and values. This strengthens tribal government authority.
Tribal land ownership enables economic development projects that benefit tribal members. The tribe can develop businesses, agriculture, or other enterprises on the land.
Land transfer supports tribal cultural practices, sacred sites, and traditional resource management. The tribe can protect ancestral lands and pass them to future generations.
Transfers land management responsibility to the tribe, potentially reducing federal administrative costs and allowing the government to focus resources elsewhere.
Counties or states lose tax revenue and regulatory authority over transferred land. Local governments may have reduced influence in the affected region.
The bill's specific resource management standards are unclear. Potential differences in environmental practices or land use compared to current federal management.
Without an official summary, the exact land parcels, acreage, and conditions remain unclear. Stakeholders lack specifics needed for full evaluation.
No clear information about whether local governments receive compensation for lost tax base or whether property owners have appeal rights.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.