Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Speeds up Army agreements to reuse dredged harbor material in Ohio.
The problem
Ohio harbors generate dredged material. Current processes for reusing it take too long. Delays prevent beneficial uses of this material.
The proposal
The bill requires the Secretary of the Army to speed up completing agreements with non-Federal groups about reusing dredged material from federally authorized Ohio harbors.
The impact
Ohio harbor operators, local communities, and environmental groups affected. Faster reuse decisions could change how dredged material is managed and used.
Speeding up dredged material reuse reduces delays in harbor maintenance. This helps keep shipping channels open and functional longer without bottlenecks.
Quicker agreements could lower costs for harbor operators and local governments. Faster processes mean less time spent on bureaucracy and paperwork.
Dredged material can be used for construction, wetland restoration, or land building. Expediting agreements enables more beneficial uses instead of disposal.
Communities can use dredged material for infrastructure projects and land development. This supports local job creation and economic growth opportunities.
Speeding up agreements might mean less time for environmental impact studies. This could allow harmful projects to proceed without full environmental examination.
Faster timelines could reduce opportunities for affected communities to comment. Local groups may have concerns that get overlooked in rushed processes.
Dredged material sometimes contains pollutants. Quick reuse without thorough testing could spread contamination to new locations.
Expedited processes reduce government review time. This makes it harder to catch mistakes or prevent misuse of the material.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.