Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes a bipartisan group to find compromise solutions to major policy disagreements.
The problem
Congress is deeply divided and struggles to pass bipartisan legislation. Political polarization prevents constructive dialogue and compromise on key issues.
The proposal
Creates the Problem Solvers TRUST Act framework enabling cross-party members to collaborate on solving major policy problems through structured negotiation and consensus-building.
The impact
Members of Congress, their staff, and constituents affected by legislative gridlock benefit from increased bipartisan cooperation and potential compromises on disputed issues.
Creates formal structure for Democrats and Republicans to work together. Reduces partisan hostility and promotes finding common ground on difficult issues.
Compromise bills could pass more easily with support from both parties. Reduces legislative gridlock and allows Congress to address more problems.
Forces consideration of multiple perspectives before finalizing policy. Solutions incorporating different party ideas may be more balanced and widely acceptable.
Shows voters that elected officials can work together constructively. May improve public confidence in government institutions and democratic processes.
Compromise might require parties to abandon core values. Members could face pressure from party leadership or constituents opposing settlements.
No details provided about how compromise solutions get implemented or enforced. Framework could be ineffective without clear process and accountability.
Bipartisan groups themselves can become deadlocked without agreement structure. Creating compromise within the compromise group could become another obstacle.
Bill lacks official summary and specifics about implementation, funding, and scope. Difficult to assess actual effectiveness without complete details.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.