Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill affirms U.S. commitments to Taiwan through six policy assurances.
The problem
Uncertainty about U.S. support for Taiwan amid geopolitical tensions with China. Taiwan seeks clear assurances of American commitment to its security and interests.
The proposal
Establishes six formal assurances to Taiwan including security support, diplomatic recognition efforts, and economic partnership commitments to strengthen bilateral relations.
The impact
Affects U.S.-Taiwan relations, U.S.-China relations, and Taiwan's security posture. Impacts defense contractors, tech companies, and diplomatic officials involved in cross-strait issues.
Clear assurances could deter military aggression and boost Taiwan's confidence. A more secure Taiwan strengthens regional stability in the Indo-Pacific.
Formal assurances remove ambiguity about American intentions toward Taiwan. This clarity benefits all parties in understanding U.S. commitments.
Taiwan is a thriving democracy and major semiconductor producer. Supporting it aligns with U.S. values and economic interests.
Strengthened ties could expand trade and tech cooperation with Taiwan. This benefits American businesses and creates economic opportunities.
China views Taiwan as part of its territory and may see assurances as interference. This could escalate tensions and strain U.S.-China relations.
Formal assurances could commit U.S. military and financial resources long-term. This limits American flexibility in responding to other global crises.
Strong commitments to Taiwan could lead to U.S. military involvement in a Taiwan-China conflict. American service members would face potential danger.
The U.S. officially recognizes China, not Taiwan. Assurances may appear inconsistent with longstanding diplomatic agreements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.