Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Restricts U.S. presidents from profiting financially while serving in office.
The problem
Presidents may use their position to increase personal wealth through business interests, creating conflicts between personal profit and public duty.
The proposal
Bill would likely prevent sitting presidents from receiving income from business holdings and require financial disclosures during their term.
The impact
Presidents would be restricted from certain earnings. Businesses owned by presidents could be affected. Public would gain transparency about presidential finances.
Prevents presidents from making decisions that benefit their personal businesses rather than the country. This helps ensure policy choices are based on public interest, not private profit.
Clear financial restrictions make it easier for citizens to trust that presidents act in the nation's interest. Transparency about finances builds confidence in government.
Presidents are public servants who should prioritize their job, not personal wealth. This enforces the principle that elected officials work for citizens, not themselves.
Restricting presidential income sources may reduce opportunities for foreign entities to gain influence by providing business benefits to sitting presidents.
Successful business owners may refuse to run for president if they must give up income. This could limit who is willing to serve as president.
Presidents can still benefit from asset appreciation even without active income. Wealthy individuals might find workarounds through trusts or family members' businesses.
Monitoring presidential finances and proving violations could be difficult. Complex business arrangements might make it hard to determine what counts as prohibited income.
Congress members and other officials can still profit from their positions. Applying rules only to presidents may seem unfair to some observers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.