Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Restricts home ownership by Chinese Communist Party members and Islamist organizations in the US.
The problem
Some policymakers believe certain foreign nationals and organizations pose national security risks through real estate purchases in the United States.
The proposal
The bill would prohibit individuals affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party or designated Islamist organizations from buying residential property in America.
The impact
Foreign nationals in specified groups would be unable to purchase homes. US real estate markets and property owners could face new regulations and compliance requirements.
Proponents argue this protects sensitive US locations from potential foreign surveillance or espionage through strategic property purchases. They contend it prevents hostile foreign entities from gaining physical presence near military bases or government facilities.
Supporters note that many countries restrict US citizens from buying property. They argue this bill creates equivalent barriers for fairness in international real estate dealings.
Advocates claim the measure limits foreign state influence over American communities and neighborhoods through concentrated property ownership.
Critics argue the bill may violate equal protection and due process rights by restricting property ownership based on nationality or political association. It could face legal challenges as potentially discriminatory.
Opponents note the bill would be difficult to enforce, as people could use shell companies or intermediaries to purchase property. Determining who qualifies under vague definitions could create costly bureaucratic burdens.
Critics warn this could trigger retaliatory restrictions on US citizens abroad and damage trade relationships. It might reduce foreign investment in US real estate, affecting property values and development projects.
The term 'Islamist' lacks legal precision and could unfairly target Muslims or Islamic organizations. Broad definitions might discriminate against religious groups without clear security justification.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.