Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Restricts U.S. funds from being used for NATO military operations or invasions.
The problem
Concerns that the U.S. contributes significant resources to NATO operations without sufficient congressional oversight or authorization for specific military actions.
The proposal
Prohibits federal funding from being spent on NATO invasion or military operations unless explicitly authorized by Congress through separate legislation.
The impact
Affects military budgets, NATO partnerships, and congressional control over defense spending and military commitments abroad.
Reinforces Congress's constitutional power to approve military spending and operations. Requires explicit votes before committing taxpayer money to specific NATO actions. Increases democratic accountability for military decisions.
Prevents automatic funding of military operations without separate approval. Gives lawmakers the ability to debate and decide on each commitment individually. Could reduce unintended military escalations.
Requires explicit justification for each military expenditure to NATO partners. May reduce spending on operations lawmakers consider unnecessary. Creates clearer tracking of defense budget allocations.
Delays could prevent rapid military response to emergencies. NATO allies may doubt U.S. commitment to collective defense. May reduce deterrence against potential adversaries.
Frequent congressional votes could create bureaucratic delays in military operations. May limit commanders' flexibility to respond to changing situations. Could reduce coordination with allied forces.
NATO partners might see this as weakening the alliance commitment. Could damage relationships with long-standing military partners. May create uncertainty about U.S. reliability in crises.
The term 'invasion' is not clearly defined in the bill title. Could create disputes about what activities are restricted. May lead to legal challenges over funding decisions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.