Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addresses food access and nutrition support for students through federal school programs.
The problem
Many students lack consistent access to nutritious meals, affecting health, academic performance, and educational equity across school districts.
The proposal
Expands federal food assistance programs in schools, potentially increasing funding, meal benefits, or eligibility for student nutrition initiatives.
The impact
Students, schools, families, and food service providers affected through changes to meal programs, nutrition standards, or federal assistance levels.
Better nutrition helps students concentrate better in class and reduces health problems. Healthier students miss fewer school days and perform better academically.
Expanded food assistance decreases money families must spend on meals. This frees up household budgets for other essential needs like housing and medical care.
Ensures all students have equal access to nutrition regardless of family income. This levels the playing field for disadvantaged students facing food insecurity.
School food programs create demand for agricultural products and food services. This supports local farmers, food suppliers, and school food service jobs.
Expanded programs require additional federal budget allocation and tax dollars. This may increase the national deficit or require cuts to other programs.
Schools must manage new eligibility rules, paperwork, and compliance requirements. This creates additional work for already-stretched school staff and administrators.
While expanding meals helps immediate hunger, it doesn't solve underlying poverty and food insecurity issues. Long-term solutions require broader anti-poverty policies.
Schools may lack kitchen capacity, trained staff, or infrastructure to serve additional meals. Unequal resources across districts could create inconsistent program quality.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.