Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Authorizes a land exchange involving properties near Greeley.
The problem
Certain federal or private lands near Greeley may be inefficiently distributed, requiring legislative authorization to swap parcels.
The proposal
The bill permits an exchange of land involving Greeley-area properties, allowing parties to trade parcels to improve land management or use.
The impact
Landowners, local governments, and conservation interests near Greeley are affected by changes in property ownership and land management.
Land exchanges can consolidate parcels into more useful configurations. This may improve agricultural productivity or wildlife management. Better organized land can be easier to manage.
Reorganizing land can potentially benefit local communities economically. Property values may improve with better land distribution. Communities may gain access to improved infrastructure or services.
Swapping lands can place environmentally sensitive areas under better protection. Conservation groups may gain control of important habitats. The exchange could support wildlife and ecosystem management goals.
The bill contains no official summary detailing what lands are involved. Taxpayers cannot evaluate the deal's fairness. The public lacks details needed for informed debate.
Land exchanges can favor certain private interests over public benefit. Without details, it is unclear if the deal serves the general public. The government may give away valuable land.
Changes in land ownership can affect environmental protections. New owners may have different conservation priorities. Ecosystems could be harmed by altered management practices.
Congress is being asked to approve a land deal with minimal information available. The lack of subjects or summary prevents proper oversight. Rushed passage without full details may bypass important safeguards.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.