Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Constitutional amendment ending slavery and forced labor as criminal punishments.
The problem
The 13th Amendment currently allows slavery as punishment for crime. This loophole permits forced labor of incarcerated people, raising human rights concerns.
The proposal
This amendment would remove the exception allowing slavery or involuntary servitude as criminal punishment, closing the loophole in the 13th Amendment.
The impact
Incarcerated people would gain protection from forced labor. States and federal prison systems would need to change labor policies and potentially adjust operations.
Eliminates a legal exception that permits slavery-like conditions in prisons. Aligns U.S. law with modern human rights standards that treat all people with dignity.
Incarcerated people would no longer be compelled to work without pay or fair compensation. Provides basic labor protections to a vulnerable population.
Strengthens America's moral authority on human rights globally. Shows commitment to abolishing slavery in all forms.
Part of broader movement to examine and reform the criminal justice system. May prompt review of other prison practices.
States and federal prisons rely on inmate labor for maintenance, food service, and other functions. Eliminating forced labor could increase operational costs or require payment systems.
If inmates must be paid for work, states face budget challenges deciding wage levels. Could strain already limited prison resources significantly.
Prisons would need new policies for work assignments and labor practices. Transition period could be complicated and costly.
Constitutional amendments require 3/4 of states to ratify, making passage very difficult. May face resistance from states concerned about costs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.