Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Constitutional amendment to ban slavery and forced labor as criminal punishment.
The problem
The 13th Amendment currently permits slavery as punishment for crime. This clause allows imprisonment combined with forced labor conditions, affecting incarcerated individuals.
The proposal
Amends the Constitution to remove the exception allowing slavery or involuntary servitude as criminal punishment, eliminating this legal loophole entirely.
The impact
Incarcerated people would gain protection from forced labor. Prison systems and states would need to adjust labor practices and policies accordingly.
Removes a constitutional provision that permits slavery. Aligns U.S. law with international human rights standards that prohibit forced labor.
Eliminates the exception in the 13th Amendment used to justify prison labor. Creates uniform constitutional protection against slavery nationwide.
Addresses concerns about exploitation in correctional facilities. May encourage examination of fair labor practices in prisons.
Brings U.S. constitutional law in line with international conventions opposing all forms of slavery. Strengthens America's position on human rights globally.
Prison systems currently rely on inmate labor for operations and maintenance. Amendment could require restructuring of prison work programs and increase costs.
Constitutional amendments require approval by 3/4 of states, a difficult threshold. May face lengthy ratification process with unclear timeline.
If prisons cannot require labor, they may need more staff or contractors to perform necessary work. Could increase correctional system operating costs.
May create disagreement about what constitutes involuntary servitude versus fair compensation for prison work. Could lead to lengthy legal disputes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.