Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes federal oversight and controls for artificial intelligence systems to prevent unsafe AI development.
The problem
Advanced AI systems could pose risks if developed without proper safeguards. Current rules don't adequately address these concerns at the federal level.
The proposal
Creates new federal authority to regulate AI development, set safety standards, and ensure companies follow rules when building AI systems.
The impact
AI companies face new requirements. Government gains regulatory power. Researchers and developers must comply with new standards. Public may benefit from safer AI systems.
Federal oversight could stop dangerous AI systems before they cause problems. Sets safety standards that all developers must meet.
Creates transparent rules for how AI gets developed and used. People know what safeguards protect them from risky AI.
Companies that follow rules get clear guidance. Can build AI safely without guessing what government wants later.
U.S. sets standards that other countries may follow. Establishes American leadership on AI safety rules globally.
New rules and approval processes take time and money. Companies may develop AI slower, delaying benefits like medical breakthroughs.
Bill details are limited, so nobody knows exactly what rules will apply. Companies and researchers face uncertainty about compliance.
Small AI companies lack resources to meet complex new requirements. Big tech companies have easier time complying.
Broad federal power over AI could be misused for censorship or control. Privacy concerns if government monitors AI development.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.