Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill allows civil rights lawyers to recover attorney fees when they win cases against the government.
The problem
Civil rights lawyers often cannot afford to take cases against government agencies because they cannot recover legal fees if they win, making it harder for people to defend their rights.
The proposal
The bill changes laws to let civil rights attorneys collect payment for their work when they successfully sue government entities, similar to existing rules for other types of cases.
The impact
Civil rights lawyers, government agencies, and people suing the government are affected. Lawyers may take more cases. Agencies may face higher legal costs. Citizens may find it easier to challenge government actions.
Attorneys will be more willing to take civil rights cases against the government when they know they can get paid if they win. This helps regular people afford to fight for their rights in court.
Currently, the government has money to hire lawyers but regular people do not. This bill makes it fairer by letting people's lawyers get paid when they win, just like government lawyers get paid.
If government agencies know they might have to pay attorney fees when they lose, they may be more careful to follow the law and respect people's rights.
Many other types of lawsuits already allow winners to collect attorney fees. This bill brings civil rights cases in line with that standard practice.
Government agencies will have to pay more money when they lose lawsuits, including attorney fees. This could increase the overall cost of government and reduce money available for other services.
Agencies might become too cautious or slow to act when they fear losing lawsuits and having to pay large legal bills. This could reduce efficiency in government operations.
Knowing lawyers can recover fees might encourage more lawsuits, including some without strong legal merit. This could overwhelm courts and waste judicial resources.
Individual government employees or small agencies with limited budgets might struggle to pay large attorney fee awards, while large agencies handle it more easily.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.