Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a process to collect court judgments against terrorists and foreign entities.
The problem
Victims of terrorism and their families struggle to collect money that courts order terrorist organizations and hostile foreign governments to pay them.
The proposal
Establishes procedures allowing victims to pursue collected judgments and assets from terrorists and foreign entities that harm Americans.
The impact
Terrorism victims and families gain legal tools to recover damages. Courts, collection agencies, and foreign relations diplomacy are affected.
Gives terrorism victims a clearer path to collect money courts have ordered paid to them. This provides financial justice and help rebuilding lives after traumatic attacks.
Many court judgments already exist but go unpaid. This bill creates systems to actually collect that money instead of leaving judgments as empty paper.
Making it harder for terrorists to hide assets and escape payment may discourage some terrorist funding and activities. Accountability can be a deterrent.
Aggressive collection efforts against foreign governments could damage diplomatic relationships with countries we need to work with. Other nations may retaliate or refuse cooperation.
Creating new enforcement systems costs money and requires new government staff. Collecting from overseas assets is difficult, expensive, and often unsuccessful.
Many terrorist groups and hostile nations have few U.S. assets to seize. Most victims likely won't recover meaningful money despite having judgments.
Expanding collection against foreign entities raises constitutional and treaty law questions. Courts may block some enforcement efforts, creating years of litigation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.