Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Limits creation and use of digital copies of people's faces, voices, and likenesses without permission.
The problem
Technology now allows creating realistic fake videos and audio of real people. This can harm reputation, enable fraud, and violate privacy without clear legal rules.
The proposal
The bill would require permission before making digital replicas of someone's identity and establish penalties for unauthorized use of deepfakes.
The impact
Artists, tech companies, and regular people would need consent before creating digital versions of others. Victims of deepfakes gain legal protection and recourse.
People get legal rights over their own face and voice. Someone cannot create fake videos of you without permission. This prevents fraud and harmful impersonation.
Fake videos used for blackmail, politics, or spreading false information become illegal. Victims can sue and get damages. This deters criminals from making harmful fakes.
Currently, laws are unclear about digital replicas. This bill creates specific rules so people and companies know what is legal. It gives courts guidance for handling disputes.
The bill likely allows people to report violations and seek court action. Companies can be held responsible for facilitating deepfakes. This gives victims real remedies.
Creating movie effects, video games, and animations often use digital versions of actors and performers. Getting permission for every use could slow production and raise costs significantly.
Political satire, comedy sketches, and artistic expression sometimes use digital replicas. Strict rules could prevent lawful speech and creative works that inform or entertain the public.
What counts as a 'digital replica' is unclear. Is a cartoon character that resembles someone illegal? Are AI avatars included? Unclear rules make compliance difficult and litigation common.
Deepfakes spread across the internet instantly and internationally. A U.S. law cannot easily stop creation in other countries. Enforcement is expensive and may prove ineffective.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.