Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Reorients the Intelligence and Analysis mission within the Department of Defense.
The problem
The Intelligence and Analysis directorate may need updated priorities and organizational focus to address current national security challenges effectively.
The proposal
The bill reorganizes the I&A mission, adjusting its responsibilities, structure, or strategic direction within the Department of Defense.
The impact
Department of Defense personnel, intelligence operations, and military strategy are affected by changes to how intelligence analysis is conducted.
Reorienting the I&A mission could help the military respond better to current threats. This might improve how intelligence is collected and shared quickly with military leaders.
Reorganizing the mission could eliminate overlap between departments. This might save money by reducing duplicate work and improving efficiency.
The bill passed its committee vote 30-0, showing both parties agree on the need for this change. This suggests the reorientation addresses a shared national security concern.
The bill summary does not detail what the reorientation actually involves. Without knowing specifics, it is hard to judge if the changes are necessary or beneficial.
Reorganizing a major intelligence office could disrupt ongoing operations and confuse personnel. Intelligence workers may face unclear responsibilities during the transition.
The bill does not specify how much the reorientation will cost. Restructuring could require significant funding that might affect other military programs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.