Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reduces tariffs on materials used to build homes.
The problem
Tariffs on homebuilding materials increase construction costs, making new homes more expensive for buyers and harder for builders.
The proposal
The bill removes or lowers tariffs on materials like lumber, steel, and other supplies needed to construct residential homes.
The impact
Homebuilders, construction workers, and home buyers could benefit from lower costs. Domestic material producers might face more competition.
Reducing tariffs on building materials could decrease construction costs. This might make new homes more affordable for families trying to buy homes.
Cheaper materials could help builders construct homes faster. This increases housing supply in areas where homes are hard to find.
Lower building costs might encourage more construction projects. This could create more jobs for construction workers and related industries.
Lower tariffs reduce supply chain costs for builders. These savings can be passed to homebuyers as lower prices.
Lower tariffs increase competition from foreign materials. Domestic producers of lumber, steel, and building supplies may lose customers.
If domestic material companies lose business, they may lay off workers. This could hurt communities dependent on these industries.
Removing tariffs might affect trade relationships with other countries. This could lead to retaliatory tariffs on American goods.
Tariffs generate government revenue. Reducing them means less money for federal programs and spending.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.