Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Veterans' Affairs, Armed Services, and Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to make STI testing more available and affordable for all Americans.
The problem
Many people lack access to affordable STI testing due to cost, location, or insurance barriers. Testing delays can worsen health outcomes.
The proposal
The bill would likely expand STI testing access, reduce costs, and improve testing availability across different healthcare settings and populations.
The impact
Patients, healthcare providers, and insurance programs would be affected through changes to testing availability, costs, and coverage requirements.
More accessible testing helps catch STIs early when they are easier to treat. Early detection prevents serious health complications and reduces transmission rates.
Preventing STI complications through early testing reduces expensive emergency room visits and hospitalizations. Treating early stages costs less than treating advanced infections.
Expanding access helps low-income and rural communities who face bigger barriers to testing. This reduces health disparities across different populations.
Widespread testing and treatment reduce disease spread in communities. Better control of STI rates protects overall public health.
Expanded testing programs require significant federal funding. Taxpayers would bear the cost of subsidizing or providing free testing services.
Building testing infrastructure in rural and underserved areas takes time and coordination. Execution delays could limit actual benefit to patients.
Making testing too easy or free might lead to unnecessary testing in low-risk situations. This wastes resources and strains healthcare systems.
Expanded testing programs mean more health data collected and stored. Privacy protections must be strong to prevent misuse of sensitive information.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.