Latest action: Ordered to be Reported Unfavorably (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 21 - 28.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Requires Federal Home Loan Banks to contribute more money to affordable housing programs.
The problem
Federal Home Loan Banks currently contribute a set amount to affordable housing programs. Some believe this amount is insufficient to meet housing needs for low-income families.
The proposal
The bill increases the mandatory contribution amount that Federal Home Loan Banks must give to the Affordable Housing Program, directing more funding toward affordable housing initiatives.
The impact
Federal Home Loan Banks face higher costs. Low-income families may gain better access to affordable housing. Taxpayers may see indirect effects through banking system changes.
Increases money available to build and preserve affordable homes for low-income families. This could help reduce homelessness and housing instability in communities across the country.
Federal Home Loan Banks are profitable institutions. Higher contributions use existing bank earnings rather than creating new taxes or government spending.
Helps seniors, people with disabilities, and working families afford safe housing. May reduce stress-related health issues caused by housing insecurity.
Affordable housing programs often revitalize neighborhoods and create local jobs in construction and property management.
Federal Home Loan Banks must pay more, potentially reducing their profits and dividends. Banks might pass costs to members through higher fees on mortgages and loans.
If banks increase fees to offset higher contributions, homebuyers might pay more for mortgages. This could make housing less affordable for middle-class families.
Forcing banks to contribute more may discourage private investment in affordable housing. Private developers might focus on profit-driven projects instead.
Without specific details about how funds are used, it is unclear whether increased contributions will actually solve housing shortages or reach those most in need.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.